Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Syringe Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Snohomish County committee pauses ordinance to ban use of county funds for syringes and smoking equipment
Summary
Committee members debated ordinance 26-017, which would bar county funds from purchasing syringes and smoking equipment; health officials and several council members warned of public-health harms and potential restrictions on passing through outbreak-response funds, and the committee held the item for further committee discussion.
A proposed Snohomish County ordinance that would prohibit the use of county funds to purchase syringes and smoking equipment for illegal drug use drew sustained debate on May 12 as the Health and Community Services Committee opted to hold the measure for further committee discussion rather than immediately setting a public hearing.
Council staff Cynthia Foley introduced ordinance 26-017 as a measure that would ban expenditure of locally collected revenues, grants and pass-through funding to purchase syringes or smoking equipment; the ordinance text would still allow the county to contract with organizations that run syringe service programs but not to provide funding for the syringes themselves.
Sponsor Councilmember Nehring framed the proposal as a policy decision about the use of taxpayer dollars, saying the intent "is to ensure that county policy is focusing on treatment, on recovery, and on accountability rather than ... facilitating or potentially enabling ongoing drug use." He urged a public process to debate the policy and suggested amendments could follow public input.
Opponents and public-health staff cautioned that needle-exchange and syringe-service programs have a longstanding research base. A health-department speaker summarized decades of research and said such programs reduce HIV and hepatitis C transmission and help distribute naloxone and connect people to treatment. Councilmember Peterson said the data are clear that hindering needle-exchange programs is associated with outbreaks of infection and public-health harms.
Several council members raised a procedural and legal concern: the ordinance language may prevent the county from distributing pass-through state or federal funds for outbreak response. Councilmember Peterson noted the text's reference to pass-through funding and said that could bar federal or state monies that would otherwise be used in response to a disease outbreak; council staff said the ordinance is written to limit county distribution of funds for purchasing syringes and smoking equipment for illegal drug use.
After extended discussion about the policy merits, public-health evidence and the ordinance’s possible fiscal and legal effects, the committee decided to hold the ordinance for further committee-level conversation rather than immediately moving it to the General Legislative Session to set a public-hearing date.
Next steps: Committee staff will schedule follow-up committee discussion; no vote on final passage was taken.
