Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water And Wells topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Falmouth board approves irrigation well variance and asks for water‑superintendent briefing as it debates setback changes
Summary
The board approved a variance for an irrigation well at 8 Associates Road, debated lowering the minimum setback for irrigation wells from 50 to 10 feet in some areas, and resolved to request the town water superintendent appear to discuss monitoring wells, Long Pond protections and communication between town departments.
The Falmouth Board of Health approved a variance request for an irrigation well on Associates Road but left open a larger policy debate on whether the town’s irrigation‑well setback should be reduced and whether staff should be empowered to approve routine deviations.
Jake (surname given alternately in the record as Fergie/Fricke), a professional land surveyor representing the applicant, told the board the proposed well was placed to minimize disturbance to naturally vegetated slopes and to keep the well as high in elevation as possible. The applicant requested relief from the standard 50‑foot setback to the lot line. Board members noted the chosen location avoided disturbance to vegetated areas below a coastal bank and that the driller had no concerns about nearby hydrant laterals; after brief questions the board voted to grant the requested variances.
The session then turned into a broad discussion of irrigation well regulations. Members debated whether to lower the minimum setback from 50 feet to 10 feet in the unsewered (insular) areas, whether to give more administrative authority to the health agent on straightforward setbacks, and how to guard against improper well sitings that could affect septic systems or create non‑potable water hazards. Board members noted that private drinking‑water wells remain largely outside routine regulation but discussed the public‑health merit of targeted testing in identified areas.
Separately, board members expressed frustration with the water superintendent’s written responses about water‑supply protections and monitoring wells and agreed to ask the town manager and select board to have the water superintendent appear before the Board of Health. Members said they want a face‑to‑face briefing focused on the Long Pond water‑supply protection area, monitoring‑well status and coordination between departments.
The board asked staff to circulate proposed language changes for the irrigation‑well section and to return the item for further consideration; if the board decides to change the regulation it will require a public hearing and the normal adoption process.
