Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council discusses data‑center language in zoning code; staff recommends definition and limits over outright ban

Hooper City Council · June 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Hooper staff warned the council that the current code could be interpreted to allow data centers and recommended drafting a specific definition with restrictions (setbacks, water/power limits, cooling methods) rather than an outright prohibition to reduce legal exposure.

Council discussion on June 4 addressed whether Hooper’s zoning code should be amended to address data centers. Staff member Darren reviewed recent actions in other Utah cities — including moratoria and detailed code amendments — and said Hooper’s code currently prohibits uses not listed but could be challenged if a data‑center applicant argues the use fits an existing category.

Darren recommended drafting a code definition and placement rules that limit location, water and power demands and cooling methods rather than attempting a blanket prohibition that could invite legal challenges. He cited Provo’s approach of defining data centers, limiting non‑evaporative cooling, placing heavy setbacks and specifying utility requirements as a template the city could adapt.

Council members asked whether a moratorium was necessary; Darren said he trusted the planning commission to exercise discretion and did not recommend an immediate moratorium but advised moving quickly to draft code language so the city is prepared should an application arrive.

"If we're going to have them, they're going to be in this specific spot — they need to be so far away from any other zone," Darren said, urging detailed zoning controls rather than an outright ban. Council expressed support for proactive code revisions and directed staff to research sample ordinance language and options used by peer cities.