Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solar Energy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board conditionally approves Norbit Solar Farm site changes, 5–0
Summary
The Town of Victor Planning Board on June 9 conditionally approved a modification to the Norbit Solar Farm that replaces fixed‑tilt racking with single‑axis trackers for a 4.428 MW AC system on a 34.93‑acre parcel, with conditions including financial surety and performance bonding; vote was 5–0.
The Town of Victor Planning Board unanimously approved a conditional amendment to the Norbit Solar Farm site plan and special use permit on June 9, permitting a 4.428 megawatt AC photovoltaic system to switch from fixed‑tilt racking to single‑axis trackers on a 34.93‑acre parcel on Main Street Fishers.
BME Associates consultant James Kritikos told the board the change would allow the array to track the sun throughout the day; he said the design follows the drawings submitted in April 2026 and last revised May 15, 2026. Kritikos also noted the nearest residences are “over 300 feet away” and that the facility will be fenced.
During public comment, a person identified as speaker 11 raised concerns about electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from inverters and said they are “dangerous to people.” Kritikos replied that the equipment is built to specification and that he did not believe the installation posed a health hazard. The board did not accept the EMF claim as a basis to withhold approval but asked staff to record the concern and, if appropriate, to request supporting technical information.
The resolution approving the amendment incorporates the town code provisions cited by staff (chapter 211, article 6, solar voltaic systems) and makes approval conditional on multiple requirements before the planning board chair signs the site plan and special use permit. Conditions the board listed to be satisfied prior to signature include addressing all staff and consultant comments, filing an escrow account or letter of credit acceptable to the town, providing evidence of long‑term financial surety for decommissioning, and obtaining a performance bond for the approved site maintenance plan. The resolution also incorporates ongoing code‑compliance requirements specified in section 2‑11‑64, paragraph f, of the town code.
Scott (board member) moved the resolution; Joe (board member) seconded. The motion carried 5–0.
Next steps: the applicant must submit written responses to staff and consultant comments and provide the specified surety and bonding documents before the chair’s signature is affixed and building permits may be issued.
