Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning Bluffs Kiskiak topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board defers "The Bluffs at Kiskiak" rezoning after hours of testimony
Summary
A comprehensive rezoning for The Bluffs at Kiskiak sked to rezone roughly 206 acres for mixed-use development including 704 homes, a CCRC and an open-air museum. Staff recommended denial for plan inconsistency; the Planning Commission split; the applicant requested and the board granted a deferral to October 13 to revise proffers and continue community outreach.
A major rezoning and special-use permit application branded "The Bluffs at Kiskiak" was deferred by the James City County Board of Supervisors after an extended public hearing and extensive public comment questioning traffic, water, cumulative impacts and plan consistency.
The applicant seeks mixed-use rezoning for roughly 206 acres that would allow residential development (up to 704 units, including continuing-care retirement community units), commercial space, an open-air museum called President—s Walk, and other uses. Staff concluded the proposal is not consistent with the county—s 2045 comprehensive plan for the Croker Interchange quadrant and recommended denial; at the Planning Commission the vote on rezoning and the master plan was 3-3 (no recommendation).
The developer described proffers including stream restoration, road improvements proffered up front, an affordable housing commitment (proffered 30% of non-CCRC units at 80% area median income), and plans for phased construction and community amenities. "We're putting [the road improvements] in upfront without question," the applicant—s representative said, emphasizing traffic mitigation and early infrastructure in phase 1.
Speakers for neighborhoods, civic groups and adjacent landowners urged denial or deferral, raising concerns about cumulative impacts with other pending developments, groundwater and well-water availability in a drought-affected region, emergency-services response times, and the scale of development relative to the predominantly rural character of the area. "We are looking at an explosion of growth in this upper county that I don't know that any of the current residents ever anticipated," said Linda Rice, articulating worries about roads, water and community character.
Board members probed proffers, affordable-housing mechanics (how 80% AMI is applied and how Marshall & Swift cost adjustments might affect long-term affordability), phasing guarantees, and the county's sewer capacity given an EPA consent order and known HRSD constraints. Several supervisors said they saw amenities they liked (affordable units, a CCRC, museum preservation elements) but expressed doubts about long-term financial sustainability and enforceability of some proffers.
At the applicant's request the board deferred action to October 13 to allow the developer time to engage more with neighbors and revise proffers. The board left the public hearing open for that date.
