Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Garden topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council tables Good Shepherd community garden proposal on 147th Street pending safety, restroom and water review
Summary
A proposed 1.3-acre Good Shepherd community garden at 5251 W. 147th Street—intended to serve young adults with disabilities in partnership with University of Illinois Extension—was tabled after residents raised traffic, fencing and restroom concerns; applicant offered relocation and buffers. Council voted to table the item 7–0.
Get email alerts on the Community Garden topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oak Forest City Council on April 14 voted unanimously to table consideration of a Special Use Permit for a proposed Good Shepherd community garden at 5251 W. 147th Street, directing staff to gather additional details on safety, water access and restroom plans.
Assistant Director Paul Ruane described the 1.3-acre proposal as a collaborative program with the University of Illinois Extension that would provide raised beds, a sensory garden and intermittent programming for high-functioning young adults with disabilities alongside volunteers from local schools and organizations. The site is zoned C1 and the applicant told the council activities would be limited in hours and that the sensory garden would be set back from the road.
Several residents questioned whether the lot’s proximity to the high-speed 147th Street created safety risks for participants and requested fencing and clearer supervision plans. Tom Plummer, representing neighbors, urged stronger physical borders; Dr. Walter Haleck raised concerns about wildlife (coyotes) and environmental impacts. Mary McMillian suggested privacy fencing and partnerships to enhance supervision.
Applicant McCormick offered to move the garden farther back on the lot and use native plants as a buffer; the applicant also said participants would be on-site for limited hours and that the program is intended to serve people who prefer quieter, contained spaces. Assistant Director Ruane confirmed there were no permanent buildings or full restrooms planned at this time, though a seasonal restroom might be considered pending Building Department approval, and running water would be available for agricultural use and basic hygiene.
Alderperson Keeler moved—Alderperson Vetter seconded—to open public comment. After hearing residents’ concerns and the applicant’s willingness to adjust the plan, Alderperson Kunz moved to table the item to the next council meeting to allow staff to review water and restroom logistics and to address fencing/safety questions. The motion to table passed 7–0.
The item will return to the council with additional staff recommendations and any revised site plans.
