Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Welfare topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board asks staff to revise draft spay/neuter ordinance to Seaside model after wide public debate
Summary
Following hours of public testimony both for and against, the board directed staff to revise a draft county spay/neuter ordinance to closely follow the City of Seaside’s model (including an unaltered‑animal certification, breeder‑permit rules and clearer enforcement/penalty language) and to return June 23 for reintroduction and subsequent adoption steps.
After extended public comment and debate, Monterey County supervisors on June 9 directed staff to return June 23 with a revised draft spay/neuter ordinance closely aligned with the City of Seaside’s ordinance and to work with Hitchcock Road JPA counsel and county counsel on implementation details.
Health Department Director Elsa Jimenez and Animal Services Administrator Cindy Burnham outlined the draft language presented to the board, which would require dogs and cats older than six months in unincorporated areas to be spayed or neutered unless the owner qualifies for one of a limited set of exemptions (law‑enforcement or service animals, documented medical exemptions, kennel/pet‑shop permit holders and short‑term visitors). Burnham cautioned that access to affordable veterinary services and staff capacity at Hitchcock Road Animal Services are constraints that the county must address to ensure compliance.
Public testimony included opposing views from the Hitchcock Road Animal Services advisory committee and some JPA board members — who urged more investment in low‑cost surgery programs and cited potential inadvertent consequences of a mandatory edict — and strong support from the SPCA, rescue groups and a slate of student speakers who characterized spay/neuter rules as a humane prevention tool to reduce shelter intake and euthanasia. The SPCA highlighted Seaside and Santa Cruz County as examples where adjusted licensing and enforcement produced reductions in shelter intake.
Supervisor Alejo moved — and the board approved — direction that staff return with a version closely mirroring Seaside’s ordinance (which explicitly builds in an ‘unaltered‑animal certification’ mechanism, tailored breeder permits, and a staged enforcement approach with compliance windows/fix‑it tickets). The board also asked staff and counsel to review fee schedules and enforcement language to ensure the ordinance is implementable and equitable for low‑income residents; staff will coordinate with Hitchcock Road JPA regarding operational implementation and fee adoption.
Provenance: Staff presentation and advisory committee background (SEG 4825–4980), extensive public testimony (SEG 5540–6640) and the board motion and vote directing staff revisions (SEG 6716–7241).
