Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation Fees topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Brian Head delays Transportation Utility Fee after resort and public concerns

Brian Head Town Council · June 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a presentation and public hearing on a Transportation Utility Fee, the Brian Head Town Council agreed by consensus to remove the TUF from the FY2027 budget and continue crafting a revised fee structure with possible resort participation; staff had proposed a $12/month per ERU option and noted a legal maximum near $684,000 annually.

The Brian Head Town Council on May 12 decided by consensus to remove a proposed Transportation Utility Fee (TUF) from the FY2027 budget and to continue working on a revised structure, potentially with resort participation. Consultants from Cruze and Associates presented the TUF study, explaining the fee converts trip-generation data into Equivalent Residential Units (ERUs) and distributes cost across property types.

Consultant Marcus Keller said the study identified a legal maximum of "approximately $684,000 annually, which would equate to roughly $30 per month per ERU," while staff-recommended options produced lower rates. The study’s recommended $12 per month per ERU would generate about $270,553 annually; an alternative scenario with a 75% commercial discount—discussed after May 12 council direction—would target roughly $100,000 and equate to about $6.50 per ERU per month.

Tom Pettigrew, general manager of Brian Head Resort, said the resort is "not opposed to the TUF but raised three points for consideration before the June 9 meeting," urging staff to ensure the ERU methodology accounts for the resort’s existing enhanced service business license fees, that SR-143 (a UDOT highway) is the resort’s primary access and could skew town-road impact calculations, and to meet briefly with staff to refine the fee and legal durability. Jim Vincent and Troy Benson spoke in favor of investigating transportation-related fees, including the possibility of a lift-ticket assessment.

Council members said Brian Head’s unusual traffic patterns—many visitors and businesses access the town via State Road 143 rather than town-maintained streets—make a standard TUF model difficult to apply. Council Member Larry Freeberg and others urged caution about over-burdening businesses. The council’s consensus direction was to remove the TUF from the FY2027 budget as adopted and to continue work on a revised structure; staff said a mid-year adoption would remain possible if an acceptable framework is developed.