Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facility Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents and board clash over planned concealed-carry class at school; policy review ordered
Summary
Public commenters objected to a private vendor27s planned concealed-carry training to be hosted by the local GOP at a school auditorium, raising concerns about fundraising, safety optics and partisan use of school facilities; staff said current facility-use policy is permissive and the board requested legal review and outreach to the applicant.
A planned July training on concealed carry and permit processing at a Rappahannock school triggered strong public reaction and prompted the board to request legal review of facility-use rules and outreach to the applicant.
Several members of the public objected to the event27s venue and to advertising that a portion of ticket sales would be donated to the local Republican committee. Emily Lockach, who identified herself as co-chair of the Rappahannock County Democratic Committee, asked the board to "take a look at whether or not the optics are great for hosting a concealed carry event at a school," citing the facility-use policy and asking whether partisan or fundraising activity is appropriate on school grounds.
Other commenters urged the board to deny use of the school. "To hold an event in this building that has anything to do with handguns would be just wrong on so many levels," said Ron Jackson, who recounted the 2007 Virginia Tech attack and asked the board to reject weapons-related programming in school buildings.
Several speakers defended firearm training and said the planned class uses simulated weapons and aims at safety and lawful carry. One commenter noted that prior hunter-safety and rifle programs had been held historically and argued training improves safety. The vendor27s public advertising (captured by attendees) included a note that "$10 per ticket sold will be donated back to the Rappahannock GOP," which many in the audience cited as a concern and a reason to reconsider facility use.
Staff responded that existing board policy treats school facilities as a "limited open public forum" and that the district27s facilities-use application process requires written assurances (including that no real firearms or weapons be brought into school buildings). "The way the policy is currently written, I think the essence of that policy was written in such a way to realize that in your rural community ... it's very open," staff said, noting the district has allowed church groups, Boy Scouts, political committees and other nonprofits to rent space in the past.
Board members asked legal staff to review whether the event27s advertised fundraising component, the vendor27s for-profit status and the vendor27s advertising create a policy or legal problem. They also discussed outreach to the applicant to ascertain whether the application matches the vendor27s public advertising and whether the event could be moved to a non-school venue. The board requested a staff follow-up and legal review before taking further administrative action.
Next steps: staff will take the vendor language and the application to legal counsel, ask the applicant for clarification (including whether the $10-per-ticket donation is part of the submitted application), and report back to the board with options. The district indicated that, under current policy, refusal based on viewpoint could create legal exposure absent a revised facilities-use policy enacted prospectively.
