Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Civic Process Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lago Vista Board confronts code confusion over 'special exception' vs. 'variance' and removes repeat agenda items
Summary
Board members, staff and residents clashed over whether special‑exception height requests should be judged by variance hardship standards. Amid that disagreement the board removed previously denied items from the agenda and directed staff to clarify code language.
During its Jan. 5 meeting the Lago Vista Board of Adjustment spent substantial time debating whether height‑related special exceptions and variances should be treated the same under city code, and the disagreement led members to remove previously denied items from the agenda.
Development Services Director Jordan told the board the city attorney’s advice — reflected in an email on the dais — is that special exceptions tied to height are being treated the same as variances for deliberative purposes under current code wording. Jordan said staff will recommend clarifying changes in a future code rewrite.
Several board members and public commenters pushed back. Remote commenter Jared Phillips said he ‘‘strongly disagree[d]’’ with the attorney’s interpretation and argued the application forms and approval standards show distinct criteria for special exceptions and variances. Other board members expressed concern that rehearing cases without substantial factual changes would create inconsistent precedent.
Because at least two recent items on the agenda had prior denials and board members concluded there had been no substantial change in facts, the board voted to remove those items from tonight’s agenda. Members cited both fairness to applicants and the need to avoid reopening settled matters without new evidence. Staff advised that the 12‑month cooling‑off language exists in the code but that its placement in the code means staff prefers to include an explicit 12‑month statement in motions to avoid ambiguity.
Jordan and members agreed the city should correct code language and public application materials so applicants and the board understand whether and when hardship standards must be met. The board’s direction leaves a follow‑up task for staff to seek a formal legal clarification and to include code cleanup in the work plan.
