Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Master Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lago Vista parks group advances 11-chapter master plan, flags funding and access issues
Summary
A Lago Vista parks committee reviewed an 11-chapter draft master plan, discussed funding options including parkland dedication fees and a $63,000 fee-in-lieu held in escrow from the Firefly Cove development, and raised program, safety and reservation-policy questions for pickleball courts and pool services.
Get email alerts on the Parks Master Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Lago Vista parks advisory committee reviewed a draft 11-chapter parks master plan and pressed staff on how to pay for proposed projects, including parkland acquisition, trail repairs and facility upgrades.
Committee presenter Mark walked members through the plan's structure and community profile, saying the draft lays out mission, inventory and a funding chapter intended to guide park development over the next five to ten years. "We will provide safe, accessible, and attractive parks, facilities and programs for all of Lago Vista," Mark said as he outlined chapters on needs assessment, vision and funding.
Why it matters: committee members warned the city has limited budget capacity and that the master plan's goals will require multiple revenue sources. David, speaking for parks staff, said the department received $85,000 in capital funds this fiscal year and saved $38,000 on recent lighting and canopy work but that grants and donations alone will not cover the plan's ambitions. He said staff submitted a grant application to LCRA for $50,000 of solar lighting for park entryways that would require an $11,000 local match.
The meeting highlighted three near-term funding and policy issues. First, David reviewed the current parkland dedication ordinance: developers must dedicate one acre per 30 dwelling units or pay a $1,050 per-unit in-lieu fee. Council direction from July asked staff and Planning and Zoning to re-examine the ordinance to ensure it is delivering capital resources for parks.
Second, a committee member raised a concern about the Firefly Cove development: phase 1 paid a $63,000 fee-in-lieu intended for the Parks Fund but that money remains in escrow pending legal review. City staff said the city manager and legal counsel are reviewing the account and the committee is following up to clarify how those funds can be applied to park capital projects.
Third, members discussed programming and facility access as revenue levers. David said reservations create exclusive use and recommended charging for reservations that exclude the broader public. He also argued that individualized programs that draw steady participation, such as a popular water aerobics class, should carry a user fee rather than be subsidized by general funds.
Pickleball courts and safety: committee members reported growing pickleball use, surface cracking on courts and golf balls from a nearby driving range landing on courts. A presenter proposed revisiting barrier nets on the driving range to limit ball incursions while avoiding blocking the lake view from a restaurant; the group discussed cost, effectiveness and aesthetic trade-offs.
Access and trails: the plan inventory noted trail threats where type-2 effluent is being distributed near Turnback Canyon and Sunset Park; committee members said sections of trail may be unusable until the effluent issue is resolved, which could affect trail expansion plans.
Next steps: staff will present drawing specifications for the Falcon Point entry signage and hope to bring an aspirational concept for Dawn Drive park development before council in March. Planning and Zoning will take the tree ordinance and fee-in-lieu uses up the next day, and staff will continue legal follow-up on the Firefly Cove escrowed fee. The minutes approval motion was moved during the meeting and advanced by voice vote in the transcript.
The committee continued work on the master plan chapters and identified funding, legal review and resident engagement as priorities for the next meetings.
