Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Energy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff updates on solar projects and warns state permits can let developers sidestep county review
Summary
County staff reported monthly construction coordination with Mid-American Energy and a west-side county solar project preparing for conditional-use hearings, detailed a 500-foot Army Corps levy setback, summarized an Iowa Supreme Court wind ruling and warned that state utilities permits have in at least one case allowed developers to bypass county permitting.
County staff provided project updates on local and regional energy developments and described legal and permitting developments that could affect local review.
Matt said Mid-American Energy is holding monthly construction meetings and that a large west-side solar project is advancing toward conditional-use hearings; the company is conducting fire training and engaging local foundations about community donations. He said engineers are coordinating details such as sign placement and that the site spans both sides of the interstate, which will affect planning.
On permitting, Matt described a recent instance where a solar developer obtained approval from the state utilities board without pursuing county permits: "The utilities commission says go ahead you're good it's power generation that's under our jurisdiction you can build that there." He said the situation echoes an earlier pipeline discussion in which state authority limited county control and that some wind and solar developers may pursue state-level permits to avoid local review.
Matt summarized an Iowa Supreme Court decision in a Worth County wind case that rejected a vested-rights claim because the developer had only permitted meteorological towers and had not purchased turbines; the court found the county's code-change process was lawful and did not meet the legal standard for bad faith. "They had not actually permitted a commercial generation wind tower... when you take that couple million dollars that you put into it, you're actually only like 1% invested in the project right now," he said, recounting the court's reasoning.
The staff member also described a planning constraint raised by the Army Corps of Engineers: a requested 500-foot setback from levies that developers must address in site plans. He urged caution in public remarks by county officials, saying statements that appear to target individual projects could be used in litigation.
No formal county action or vote on permitting policy was recorded during this meeting; staff said they will continue to monitor state-level decisions and update the commission as needed.
