Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pretrial Reform topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
SB 562 would let judges order partial refunds of bail premiums when charges are dropped; industry warns of business impacts
Summary
Sen. Ashby's SB 562 would allow judges to order up to an 80% refund of a bail bond premium if charges are dropped or dismissed within 20 days; supporters framed it as fairness for low‑income families, while bail agents warned of legal, economic and operational consequences. Committee moved the bill to Appropriations (on call).
Senator Ashby presented SB 562 to create a narrow judicial path for refunding a portion of private bail bond premiums when charges are not filed or are dismissed within 20 days of posting bail. Ashby said the bill is intended to provide financial relief for people and families who paid premiums to secure release but ultimately face no charges.
Josh Schmidt of The Bail Project and Esteban Nunez of the Anti‑Recidivism Coalition testified in support, saying bail premium refunds would remedy an unfair financial burden on low‑income people who must borrow or pay to obtain release and then never face charges. Schmidt said the bill requires a fact‑based court hearing before any refund and permits judges to determine a fair amount up to 80% of the premium.
Opponents from the bail industry, including longtime licensed bail agents and trade associations, warned the bill would upend business models, reduce availability of bail services and could lead agents to "vet" clients for guilt. Several witnesses raised legal concerns about premium return authority, citing Prop 103 and Department of Insurance rate‑filing rules; some said the bill could push small, often minority‑owned bail businesses into insolvency.
Committee members debated tradeoffs: some acknowledged the bill’s fairness aim and incremental approach; others raised concerns about unintended consequences for access to bail. The committee voted to pass SB 562 as amended to the Appropriations Committee and left it on call for final tallies and additional negotiations.
