Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Immigration Detention topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Padilla bill would cap commissary markups at private ICE detention centers amid reports of steep prices

California State Assembly Standing Committee on Public Safety · June 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

SB 941 (Padilla) would prohibit commissary prices in private immigration detention facilities that exceed a 35% markup above vendor cost; sponsor and witnesses cited UCLA and Attorney General reports documenting markups up to 300% and urged passage to curb exploitation of detained people and their families.

Senator Padilla presented SB 941 to limit commissary markups in private immigration detention facilities to no more than 35% above vendor cost. Padilla said private operators and third‑party vendors set high prices for essential items and that families often shoulder the burden while detained people earn roughly $1 per day through facility work programs.

Jackie Gonzales, co‑executive director of Immigrant Defense Advocates, testified in support and relayed stories about detained people and families forced to pay for basic hygiene, food and clothing. Gonzales cited a UCLA report and a 2023 attorney‑general investigation that documented steep commissary prices and poor facility conditions, including reports of limited access to clean water.

Supporters registering "me too" included the Attorney General's office (Candace Chung), Los Angeles County district attorney’s office, and multiple legal‑defense and immigrant‑advocacy organizations. The author asked for an "aye" vote; the committee recorded the item as moved to the Appropriations Committee and left it on call for a full tally.

Padilla and witnesses emphasized that the bill does not change federal immigration enforcement or custody decisions, and that the intent is to prevent corporate price gouging in facilities operating under federal contracts but doing business in California. The committee recorded votes consistent with moving the bill forward and kept the item on call for members to add on.