Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Government Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Island County adopts procurement and records updates to align code with state law
Summary
The Board of Commissioners unanimously adopted two ordinances: C21-26 updates procurement and public‑works contracting language (including preferential purchasing language and changes to public works thresholds) and C22-26 updates records-of-proceedings language to reflect electronic storage and state archival practice.
Get email alerts on the Local Government Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Island County’s Board of Commissioners unanimously adopted two ordinance updates during a regularly scheduled meeting, approving changes to procurement and to the county’s records-of-proceedings rules.
The first ordinance, C21‑26, amends Island County Code chapters 2.29 (services, electronic data processing and telecommunications systems contracts) and 2.3 (purchases and contracts). County budget staffer Susan Geiger summarized the edits and told the board the changes mostly align local code with state law (RCW references included in the staff packet). Geiger said the update clarifies the definition of "service," adds language allowing preferential purchases of products made from recycled or reusable materials consistent with state law, simplifies cross‑referenced code language and updates the Public Works contracts section to reflect recent changes.
Geiger also described several substantive procurement changes: the public works contract threshold is increased (the transcript records an increase described as "from 350 ... to 650" and states the change is phased over four years), retainage for performance bonds is eliminated for contracts under 5,000 (as shown in the staff redlines), and the code includes language to support participation by small minority‑, women‑ and veteran‑owned businesses. "It also allowed for an increase in the limit ... and a simplification of the code so that you're not looking in several different sections," Geiger said.
After no public comments were offered on the ordinance, a commissioner moved to adopt C21‑26; the motion was seconded and the board voted on the record "Aye." The chair announced the ordinance "passes unanimously." The board did not record a roll‑call tally in the transcript.
The board then considered Ordinance C22‑26, which updates Island County Code 2.08.1.06 (records of proceedings). Jennifer Rolle, the county staffer presenting that item, said the amendment removes outdated language and clarifies that, consistent with recent county action allowing electronic meeting documents, the official records will be handled in line with current RCW requirements. "Adoption of this amendment would remove the outdated language from the code and clarify the records will be handled consistently with the current RCW requirements," Rolle said. She added that the county keeps a sealed electronic copy in its county drive and sends meeting documents to the state archives so members of the public can access them via the state archives website.
Commissioners asked for procedural clarification about where electronic originals are kept and how they are accessed; Rolle explained the county stores a sealed electronic version on a county directory and also submits records to the state archives. After no public comment, a commissioner moved to adopt C22‑26; the motion was seconded and the board approved the ordinance unanimously on the record.
What happens next: both ordinances passed on the record during this meeting and the county will implement the updated procurement and records procedures consistent with the changes described in staff materials. The transcript reflects the board's action but does not include a detailed roll‑call vote tally.
