Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Civil Rights topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee weighs SB 747 to let Californians sue federal officers for constitutional violations
Summary
SB 747 would create a state cause of action allowing suit against federal officers who violate the U.S. Constitution, mirroring standards in 42 U.S.C. §1983; survivors’ testimony and broad civil-rights backing faced pushback from law-enforcement groups concerned about qualified immunity and retroactivity.
On June 12 the Assembly Judiciary Committee heard extensive testimony on SB 747, the so-called 'No Kings' Act, sponsored in the Assembly by Senator Wiener. The measure would permit Californians to bring state-law claims against federal officers for violations of constitutional rights and would import liability standards used under federal civil-rights statutes.
Javier Ramirez, who said he was unlawfully detained and held for five days by federal agents, described the incident to the committee: “They were armed. They were masked and carrying heavy rifles... I told them I was a US citizen. I was born here, but they ignored me,” he said, urging passage to provide an accountability path.
Supporters including Protect Democracy United and a coalition of civil-rights organizations argued the bill fills a gap left by the Supreme Court's limitation of Bivens actions and would align remedies across federal, state and local officers. Cameron Kistler, a counsel for Protect Democracy United, said the change is intended to allow a remedy where federal doctrine currently forecloses it.
Opposition came from law-enforcement organizations including the California Police Chiefs Association and multiple sheriff and deputy associations which raised questions about how the bill defines qualified immunity, potential retroactivity, litigation exposure and costs for local governments. The CPCA urged amendments to ensure that any state definition of qualified immunity tracks federal standards and that retroactivity not permit relitigation of already-adjudicated cases.
Committee members expressed sympathy for survivors and a desire to continue technical discussions with law enforcement. The committee approved an amendment adding urgency and placed the bill on call for further consideration.
The author said he will continue negotiations to tether qualified immunity language to federal case law while ensuring the law allows victims of federal-authority abuse a route to redress.
