Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Roundup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Beacon Falls IWWC approves minutes, rearranges agenda and presses for stronger erosion oversight on town projects
Summary
At its May 13 meeting the Beacon Falls Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission approved prior minutes, voted to rearrange the agenda, and discussed multiple permit updates; Commissioner Brian Swan raised concerns about inadequate erosion controls on a town‑owned West Road project.
The Town of Beacon Falls Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission met May 13 and conducted routine business including approval of prior meeting minutes, a procedural vote to rearrange the agenda, and an adjournment vote. The Commission also received status updates on several permits and projects and recorded commissioner concerns about municipal erosion‑control oversight.
The Commission approved the minutes with David Keating’s revision (motion by Commissioner Michael Pratt, seconded by Vicechair John Smith). The recorded vote showed Knapik, Smith, Pratt and Swan voting aye and Commissioner James Weed abstaining. Later, the Commission voted to rearrange the agenda to better suit the public and adjourned at 8:50 p.m.; both procedural motions carried.
Commissioner Brian Swan raised specific concerns about a Town‑owned project on West Road, reporting missing or inadequate erosion and sedimentation controls including absent silt fencing and missing silt sacks in catch basins. Commissioners discussed the need for continued monitoring and enforcement of erosion‑control requirements on municipal projects; no formal enforcement action was taken that evening.
Staff updates included a DEEP (Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection) site meeting cited by Vicechair John Smith regarding work at 43 Buckingham Drive/Posick. DEEP representatives flagged issues including pond and dam modifications, armoring along a brook, and a possible overflow‑pipe discharge with potential impacts to a designated trout stream; DEEP indicated additional review and that modifications will be required consistent with prior approvals.
Several other permits (e.g., 40 Lancaster Drive; 9 Haviland/Lancaster Drive industrial lots; Region 16 football field) were discussed with staff noting continued review or no significant updates; no final approvals or denials were recorded.
