Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners press staff on "zero" ad valorem allocation for housing; staff lists bonds, ARPA and surtax as alternatives
Summary
A slide showing no ad valorem dollars for the county's Housing Initiative Program prompted commissioners to seek a fuller account of other funding sources; staff said $43 million remains in HIP carryforward and identified bond capacity, ARPA and surtax as possible sources.
Commissioners expressed concern when a budget slide showed no ad valorem funding proposed for the Housing Initiative Program (HIP) in 2027 and asked staff what other resources would support affordable-housing projects.
Staff and county housing staff (Jonathan Brown) outlined multiple non-ad valorem sources that they expect to use: remaining bond proceeds (about $110 million in bond capacity discussed for future issuance), roughly $43 million still available in HIP carryforward, additional ARPA replacement dollars and available surtax funds. Jonathan Brown told the board staff intends to return on July 11 with recommended allocations against incoming projects.
Why it matters: commissioners worried that portrayals of "zero" ad valorem funding might be misread by the public as deprioritizing housing. Several commissioners said they wanted full transparency about all the funding streams — loans, low-interest financing and inclusionary-zoning credits — that currently support county housing efforts.
Key details: - HIP funds: staff said $43 million remains in the Housing Initiative Program carryforward and that bond proceeds and other sources can be matched to upcoming projects. - Bond capacity: staff described roughly $110 million in general obligation bond capacity (to be issued in future years) and noted that some projects had historically been financed via bonds and federal/state grants. - Next briefing: staff will bring recommendations and a funding plan for housing projects to the board on July 11.
Board direction: commissioners asked staff to provide a written breakdown of all non-ad valorem housing funding sources and to return with specific project recommendations and how those dollars would be matched or recycled.
