Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Energy Efficiency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City advisory committee urges council action to fund quick-payback building upgrades
Summary
At a committee meeting, staff and new asset-management director outlined energy-assessment findings for the Skyline Center and police headquarters, recommending phased lighting upgrades, controls recommissioning and a dedicated capital fund; members urged presenting priorities to city council for the November budget cycle.
Members of the city’s advisory committee on energy and sustainability met June 11 to review energy-assessment findings for the Skyline Center and the police headquarters and to discuss funding strategies for near-term efficiency work.
The committee heard that a memo summarizing recommended energy-efficiency measures for both buildings was forwarded to the city manager ahead of the budget cycle. Robin Slate, who introduced herself as the city’s director of asset and property management, and Daryl (facility staff) joined the meeting to answer questions about implementing the recommendations.
Daryl described a phased strategy for Skyline Center that starts with the most populated floors and emphasizes replacing old fixtures with integrated occupancy and daylight-sensing fixtures and overhauling the building’s lighting-control system. "You can just replace the tubes, but then we're still up against 20‑year‑old fixtures and valves," Daryl said, arguing a control-system revamp and sensors will deliver sustained savings.
Committee members pressed staff about the police headquarters, where Daryl said several ERUs and building-control elements were not operating as designed; he identified Johnson Controls as the proprietary vendor and said he would meet with them to scope a recommissioning. "If we have equipment not working properly as designed, then we need to figure that out," Daryl said.
Members noted the assessments showed short payback periods for some work: one member cited a roughly $100,000 recommissioning line with an estimated payback of about 0.2 years. Committee member Sean Sullivan said that quick paybacks mean the city should prioritize the work: "I don't know how we can't find a $100,000 this year to get that done," he said.
On funding, staff reported a new capital bucket for Skyline-related work fed by lease revenues and suggested the committee consider advocating to city council for a dedicated energy-efficiency or clean-energy fund. Members discussed a revolving approach in which rebates and verified energy savings would be retained to finance further projects rather than returning to the general fund; one participant said previous projects had returned about $80,000 in rebates that could have been reused.
Staff described the committee’s formal role as advisory: recommendations are routed through the city manager to council. To influence the November budget process, the committee was advised to have council-level presentations and costed action steps ready by October. "If council decides it's an initiative they want to take, we want that in October so the November budget can prioritize it," a staff member said.
Beyond local funding, staff updated the committee on outside resources. The state informed staff that the city’s applications to the federal Climate Pollution Reduction Grant — for a community greenhouse‑gas inventory and a city climate action plan — were accepted for further scoping; staff said those projects will take roughly six to eight months once work begins. The city also submitted materials to the U.S. Green Building Council for LEED for Cities review and expects a response by the end of July. Separately, the city applied to DOE-backed ChargingSmart (bronze designation) and is working toward further SolSmart steps to streamline solar and EV permitting.
Committee members flagged the broader operating environment: staff and members noted a pending Duke Energy rate filing that seeks a multiyear increase (members discussed a 15% request and how smaller annual allowances would compound), which would raise municipal operating costs and increase the financial case for efficiency projects.
The meeting concluded with agreement that the committee will make energy-efficiency funding and a possible dedicated sustainability capital fund an agenda item for future meetings and that staff will provide bylaws and the draft dashboard for members to review. The committee adjourned and noted there will be no July meeting; members will reconvene in August.
