Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Joplin staff proposes city cover 75% of sewer-assessment projects; homeowner share capped at 25% up to $150,000
Summary
City staff presented proposed clarifications to sewer-assessment policy: eligible projects limited to 2'5 existing legally conforming lots and sewer-construction costs; the city would cover 75% (up from 25%) and property owners would pay the remaining 25% capped at $150,000; assessments would be payable over five years and must be settled at property sale.
Mister Johnson, a public-works staff member, presented proposed clarifications to Joplin's sewer-assessment policy at the Dec. 15 informal council meeting, including eligibility rules, covered costs and a new cost-sharing formula.
Johnson said assessment projects would apply only to existing legally conforming lots and would be considered for groups of two to five lots. Eligible costs include survey, design, easements and all sewer construction work; private utilities such as water-line extensions or power were excluded. Johnson described a change in the city's share of costs: the city would increase its contribution from 25% to 75% of project cost. The remaining 25% of project cost would be the responsibility of property owners, limited to not exceed $150,000 per project example used in the presentation. Johnson illustrated that on a $150,000 project the property-owners' share would be $37,500 if split as presented.
Under the clarified policy, annual or monthly assessment payments would be available for a period not to exceed five years, and any remaining assessment balance would be due in full at the sale of the property. Johnson said the intent is to align assessment treatment with typical residential development practice and to avoid long-term assessments beyond five years.
Council member Bard asked whether the homeowner cap could be raised to $250,000 given examples of long runs and high construction costs; Bard cited a hypothetical long uphill run and an example needing 400 feet of sewer line. Council member Edmond and staff replied that amounts beyond the $150,000 cap would be the developer or homeowner's responsibility and that increasing the cap could require additional planning and potential adjustments to sewer charges. Carlin asked how the program would be funded; Johnson said the city maintains funds in the sewer fund for extensions and that the sewer fund would be used.
No formal vote occurred at the informal session; staff presented the policy clarifications for council consideration and questions.
