Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Audit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board says state auditors flagged possible misuse of federal funds; forensic audit firm hired
Summary
Board members said state auditors found concerns involving federal (Title I) funds; district leaders said they cooperated with the state prosecutor, engaged a forensic audit firm and submitted a victim impact statement while the inquiry continues.
Get email alerts on the Audit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board members discussed an ongoing fiscal review after state auditors flagged potential misuse of federal Title I funds. In a summary of the district's response, officials said they have cooperated with investigators, engaged an external forensic audit firm and filed a victim impact statement with prosecuting authorities.
What was said: Dr. Andes described the allegations during a broader budget discussion: "The allegation is that federal funds — Title I funds — were misused and abused," he said, and noted that the office of the state prosecutor had become involved. He said the district hired a firm to conduct a forensic audit at the recommendation of Superintendent Wallace and that the audit team will set the parameters for the review.
Why it matters: If federal funds were used improperly, federal reporting and compliance obligations and potential recovery actions could follow. Board leaders said they are cooperating with the investigation and pursuing a forensic audit to identify the facts. The meeting record includes no conclusion about culpability or case outcomes; the matter remained under investigation at the time of the meeting.
District response and oversight steps: Officials said they notified appropriate authorities, hired an external firm for a forensic review and submitted a victim impact statement to the court. The board emphasized transparency and said the audit will determine the scope and findings.
What the record does not show: The meeting transcript does not include findings from the forensic review or a law‑enforcement disposition. No individual was named in the public discussion as convicted or charged in the meeting record; the office of the state prosecutor was described as having been engaged.
Next steps: The district expects the forensic audit team to define the review parameters; board and staff said they will report developments as they become available.

