Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Discipline Matrix topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oakland ad hoc panel discusses disciplinary ranges for animal dispatches, control holds, off‑duty availability and insubordination
Summary
The Oakland Police Department discipline ad hoc panel reviewed remaining manual rules, including use-of-force categories for shooting injured animals, control holds, off‑duty availability expectations, and insubordination and demeanor standards, and directed staff to circulate drafts to stakeholders and the city attorney.
Get email alerts on the Discipline Matrix topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Oakland Police Department Discipline Matrix ad hoc panel reviewed several remaining manual-of-rules sections and proposed discipline ranges across multiple categories, referring several items for stakeholder and legal review.
On duty firearm discharge to dispatch an injured animal: Captain Brian Hubard said officers should first contact animal services and explore transport to a veterinary clinic; supervisors could authorize shooting in limited circumstances. Panelists proposed discipline ranges from counseling on a first sustained violation up to termination for repeated, out‑of‑policy shootings.
On control holds (escort, elbow twist lock, armbar): the group described these as low‑level intentional techniques intended to gain compliance, and recommended counseling or short suspensions when applied out of policy, with elevation to larger suspensions when injury occurs.
On availability of off‑duty members: members debated harsher penalties for repeat failures to maintain reachable contact info during emergencies, stressing practical challenges when officers live outside the jurisdiction and the limits of communications infrastructure during large disasters.
On insubordination and disrespect: the panel discussed ranges for disrespectful conduct, noted the chief’s ability to aggravate in egregious cases (racial slurs, harassment), and flagged the need to guard against improper use of these rules by unethical supervisors.
Next steps: Captain Hubard said the draft would go to stakeholders and the city attorney; the panel hopes to complete remaining discussion in one or two more meetings before broader stakeholder review.

