Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council advances Memorial Hall MOU with citizens’ Friends group; lodging tax, fundraising and safeguards debated
Summary
Council advanced a first-reading MOU formalizing a public-private partnership with Friends of Joplin Memorial Hall to renovate the building, while debating contingency plans, a $2 million private-fundraising pledge and proposed lodging-tax changes to pay bonds.
The Joplin City Council on Dec. 1 advanced a memorandum of understanding with Friends of Joplin Memorial Hall to formalize a public-private partnership for saving and renovating the century-old Memorial Hall.
City staff and Friends representatives described a phased timeline that includes environmental and historic-preservation studies, fundraising and potential bond financing supported by a lodging-tax increase. Laurie Hahn, speaking for the Friends group, said the organization has begun fundraising steps, applied for a SHPO historic-preservation grant and intends to seek historic tax credits and additional grant opportunities to build conceptual designs and advance construction planning.
The Friends group has committed to raising $2,000,000 of private capital to help secure the project, Hahn said, and staff told the council a 20% contingency had been built into early cost estimates. City Attorney Peter Edwards said reversionary (clawback) language would appear in future deed or lease documents and that the city would include safeguards and approval checkpoints when construction bids and final costs are known.
Council debate focused on safeguards and timeline specificity. Council members asked whether the CVV (Convention & Visitors/Visitor) advisory board had been consulted and whether lodging-industry support hinged on changing the advisory board makeup. Staff said hotel-industry endorsement is important to move a prefiled lodging-tax bill through the legislature and that the MOU will return for possible amendment with a fundraising timeline and other clarifications.
Mayor Cortez, who said he had previously voted to demolish Memorial Hall, described the Friends’ proposal as a compelling alternative and urged moving the MOU forward so community fundraising and grant work could progress. The council advanced the MOU on first reading to second and third readings (vote recorded 9–0).
Why it matters: The MOU starts a multi-year, multi-step effort to restore a locally significant civic building without immediate use of property tax; it also ties future capital plans to lodging-tax revenues and private fundraising and raises questions about governance, board composition and project contingencies.
Next steps: Staff and the Friends group will refine the MOU to include a 60-day timing change for a right-of-first-refusal clause (per transcript discussion), work with the CVV advisory board on membership concerns before the next council meeting, refine a capital-raising timeline, and return with amendments and contract-level documents for later council approvals.
