Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Environment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Environmental group urges Joplin council to oppose reduced monitoring at Prospect Village site
Summary
EcoSavvy Insights told the council the developer's 2024 Phase 2 report shows surface-soil contaminants—including dioxins—above residential screening levels at parts of the Prospect Village redevelopment site and asked the council to oppose a permit modification that would reduce state monitoring and to host a DNR hearing at city hall.
At the April 20 council meeting, Kaylin Lorraine of EcoSavvy Insights urged the Joplin City Council to formally oppose a Class 3 permit modification request filed by International Paper Company with the Missouri Department of Natural Resources. Lorraine said the modification would reduce monitoring of 13 chemicals at the former International Paper site and that EcoSavvy's review of the developer's 2024 Phase 2 environmental site assessment found surface soil concentrations exceeding residential screening levels, including dioxins in areas proposed for youth athletic fields.
Lorraine asked the council to take three actions: formally oppose the Class 3 permit modification, offer city hall as a venue for a DNR public hearing, and make remediation plans for Prospect Village publicly available. "If the site is safe for our children to play games on, the data should be open for all of us to see," Lorraine told the council.
Council response and next steps Council members thanked Lorraine for bringing the issue to the council's attention. Councilor Jackson reminded participants that members of the public and interested parties can sign up with the Missouri DNR to receive notices of permit-modification activity, and councilors discussed the potential for the city to request or host a DNR public hearing. Councilor Price and others emphasized the potential long-term risks to public health and tourism and urged extra caution during development planning.
Attribution and limits The article reports the environmental concerns raised by EcoSavvy Insights and the council's response during an on-the-record public comment period. It does not independently verify the soil testing results cited; Lorraine referenced the developer's 2024 Phase 2 report and requested that the DNR hold a public hearing and that remediation plans be made public.
What comes next: EcoSavvy said the DNR's public comment period runs through May 4 (as stated in the presentation) and that the organization has formally requested a DNR hearing. Council members suggested staff could help coordinate interested-party signups and consider options for city involvement in the hearing process.
