Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Solid Waste topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Joplin staff to negotiate residential trash contract with Republic Services; council favors opt-in recycling and on-call bulky pickup

Joplin City Council · April 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a staff presentation on three bids, city consultants and staff said Republic Services was lowest cost on most scenarios; council expressed preference for keeping recycling opt-in and for an on-call bulky-item pickup, directing staff to finalize negotiations with Republic and return a contract for formal consideration.

City staff and consultant Burns & McDonnell presented the results of a competitive procurement for Joplin's residential trash services at the April 20 meeting, and council signaled support for staff's recommended path forward: authorize negotiation with Republic Services on a contract that would keep recycling as an opt-in service and set bulky-item pickup as call-in (rather than a universal, scheduled quarterly pickup).

Julie Davis, the Burns & McDonnell consultant, told the council the city received three proposals — EcoWaste Solutions, GFL Environmental and Republic Services — and that Republic was the lowest-cost proposer in most evaluated scenarios. Davis summarized service options evaluated in the RFP: weekly trash collection, separate or commingled yard waste, various bulky-item collection schedules (monthly, quarterly or on-call), and recycling offered either as opt-in for subscribing households or as a universal service with carts for all residents.

Davis described the financial trade-offs: the current city-per-household fee for basic service is $13.31; depending on the options selected, modeled per-household fees could rise (universal recycling increases per-household cost substantially in the consultant's models). Davis said universal recycling would expand participation from about 1,700 current subscribers to roughly 17,000 households and that providing universal service would raise costs due to cart purchase, program rollout and processing — and due to volatility in recycling commodity markets.

Council discussion Councilors focused questions on cart counts and pricing for additional carts, bulky-item pickup frequency and likely behavioral effects (possible roadside dumping if pickup is too infrequent). Mr. Bard asked whether additional carts would incur ongoing monthly charges; Davis indicated a recurring monthly fee for additional carts (modeled at approximately $5 in the proposal). Several council members (Mister Datar, Miss Price, Mister Bard, Mister Cortez, Mister Moran, Mister Cowles, Mister Campbell) expressed concern about the cost burden if the city adopted universal recycling and favored retaining opt-in recycling with a call-in bulky pickup to avoid increased fees and potential dumping issues.

Decision and next steps Based on council feedback, City Manager Edwards said staff would proceed to finalize negotiations with Republic Services on a contract aligned with the opt-in recycling and on-call bulky-item approach and would bring the finalized contract back for formal action at a future meeting.

Attribution: Direct quotes and specific cost figures come from the Burns & McDonnell presentation and staff discussion at the April 20 council meeting.