Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Jefferson Exchange topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves Jefferson Exchange Lot 1 with lighting and sign calculation conditions

Frederick County Planning Commission · January 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Planning Commission approved the Jefferson Exchange Lot 1 site plan Jan. 14 with a condition that front-facing building lights be limited to 14 feet and side-baffled so bulbs are not visible from second-floor townhouse windows, and the sign calculation modified to 'no more than 30 times the square root of F' per code.

The Planning Commission approved the Jefferson Exchange Lot 1 site plan (SP04-23) on Jan. 14 after receiving a proffered compromise on lighting and signage from the applicant.

Applicants from St. John Properties sought a signage-calculation modification and taller lighting to serve tenant signage on large industrial/office buildings. Commissioners balanced tenant visibility with nearby residential impacts and approved a modification that allows signage calculated per the applicant’s requested method (30 times the square root of F, as defined in code) while imposing a lighting restriction at the front of Building A.

Commissioner Joel Rensberger’s motion (as amended) granted the lighting modification except at the front of Building A, where the Commission required the fixtures be reduced to 14 feet and side-baffled so the bulbs are not visible from the second floor of townhouses across the street. The motion also incorporated Commissioner Elizabeth Pasierb’s amendment to clarify the sign-calculation modification language. The motion passed 7-0.

Why it matters: The conditions reflect a common planning compromise — allowing flexibility for commercial signage while protecting nearby residential livability through lighting controls. The Commission asked for specific baffling and height controls rather than blanket approval of taller fixtures.

Next steps: Applicant to provide final lighting details and baffle specifications consistent with the Commission’s condition.