Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Conservation Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves Drake Ranch conservation‑focused PUD with performance‑based septic and road conditions
Summary
The board unanimously approved a 407.4‑acre PUD for Drake Ranch that preserves thousands of surrounding acres in conservation easement, limits development to 40 lots and requires performance‑based wastewater treatment, traffic turn‑lane work and a final master plan return for approval.
The Marion County Board unanimously approved a preliminary planned unit development (PUD) on Nov. 18 that will allow a conservation‑oriented subdivision on 407.4 acres adjacent to thousands of preserved acres of Drake Ranch. The vote included a set of conditions addressing density, wastewater treatment, on‑site amenities and traffic improvements.
Commissioners and staff framed the proposal as an opportunity to protect a large contiguous conservation area while allowing limited, high‑end residential development in a clustered design. The applicant emphasized that most of the family’s broader holding — roughly 4,750 acres referenced during the presentation — will remain under conservation easement and that new lots were clustered to limit road and impervious‑surface impacts.
Infrastructure and environmental safeguards: County staff recommended conditions requiring a maximum of 40 residential lots (with one caretaker residence). The board added language that allows a technical review within 30 days to determine whether one additional dwelling (41 total) could be counted under the code; otherwise the cap remains 40. The commission required performance‑based advanced wastewater treatment (AWT/performance systems such as the Fuji Clean model cited by the applicant), photometric lighting plans, a tree preservation plan for linear park corridors and left‑turn lane/access improvements on SR‑200 coordinated with FDOT and county engineers.
Why it mattered: Staff voiced concerns about consistency with the comprehensive plan’s rural density (1 unit per 10 acres) and the need to connect to central utilities if lots exceed certain thresholds, but the applicant presented an analysis showing that a performance‑based septic cluster produces lower nutrient loading than a spread‑out 10‑acre lot pattern. The board balanced these issues by requiring AWT systems and other protections rather than forcing a long, costly municipal extension along SR‑200.
Next steps: The applicant must return with a final PD master plan or equivalent for board approval, provide a tree preservation plan and meet the specified traffic and environmental conditions. County staff will monitor AWT design and work with utilities on long‑term service options.
