Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Normandy Park council clarifies opposition to House Bill 2389 on juvenile justice
Summary
The Normandy Park City Council voted to clarify that its prior stance opposing untested juvenile-justice reforms applies to House Bill 2389, citing concerns about default release provisions, resource burden, and public safety. The motion passed after a second and a brief discussion.
Get email alerts on the Legislation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Normandy Park City Council voted to clarify that its previously stated concerns about untested justice reforms apply specifically to House Bill 2389.
Mayor Eric Zimmerman moved that the council adopt an explicit opposition to HB 2389, which he described as establishing a "default release" or deferral for juveniles even in serious cases unless a judge meets a higher evidentiary threshold. Zimmerman said the change would likely increase costs for public defense and prosecution, burden courts with extra hearings, and could limit options for keeping dangerous juveniles in custody.
Chief Dan Yerkowski, speaking for the police perspective, cited recent juvenile crimes in the city and warned that codifying broader limits on detention could make it harder to keep individuals who pose a danger off the street. Other council members also expressed concern that the bill would shift authority away from prosecutors and constrain the judiciary’s discretion.
Council member (second) moved to second Zimmerman’s motion, and the council voted in favor with the mayor calling for "aye" and the motion carrying. The motion clarifies that Normandy Park’s past positions on justice reform inform the council’s formal opposition to House Bill 2389 during the 2026 legislative session.
Why it matters: the council framed its opposition around public-safety incidents in the city and anticipated legal and financial impacts if the bill becomes law. The vote formalizes the city’s position for legislative advocacy and intercity coordination.
What’s next: the city will use the clarified position in testimony and communications with partner cities and legislators as the bill continues through the legislative process.
