Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff urges renovating Normandy Park’s City Hall and prioritizing park, sidewalk and road-safety projects
Summary
City staff presented a plan to renovate the existing City Hall (an estimated $2.5M focused on mechanical and structural repairs) instead of immediately building a new $12M facility, freeing reserves to fund park improvements, mid-block crossing designs and sidewalk projects; councilors debated cost realism and phasing.
City staff recommended the Normandy Park City Council postpone construction of a new $12,000,000 city hall in favor of a phased renovation of the existing building focused on mechanical and structural systems, staff said at the council’s April 28 study session.
"What I want to talk about is...instead of a new city hall, we'd like you to consider doing a restoration of this building," Amy, city staff leading the presentation, told the council. Staff outlined a budget that targets about $2.5 million for critical mechanical and structural work — including HVAC replacement and skylight repairs — and preserves roughly $2,000,000 as a building-replacement fund for the long term.
The staff proposal would reallocate funds to other near-term priorities, including Mar Vista Park improvements (estimated $1,400,000) and an aggressive push on local road-safety projects, notably design work for mid-block crossings at 176th and 178th and missing sidewalks on Sylvester Road. Amy said the combined scope of prioritized projects could total about $6,800,000 without issuing new debt, using undesignated general-fund reserves and grant-seeking for construction.
Councilors raised questions about cost estimates and timing. One member warned that a $2.5 million estimate could climb as work proceeds, and asked for the engineering study and more detail about likely code upgrades triggered by a major remodel (for example, sprinkler systems). Amy acknowledged escalation risks and recommended phasing work and using an architect to establish firm priorities and staged budgets.
Staff also highlighted long-term cost exposure: using a 4% escalation rate, staff estimated a $12,000,000 new-build could approach $26,000,000 by 2046, and argued that modest preservation plus a dedicated replacement fund could buy time while still advancing other city goals. Council members expressed differing views: some favored the conservative preservation route to maintain reserves, while others emphasized the need to position projects for grant competitiveness by completing design work now.
Next steps staff outlined include presenting Mar Vista Park construction bids (anticipated in June), pursuing design contracts for the mid-block crossing and sidewalk projects (estimated design cost roughly $120,000 with possible construction costs in the $1.2M–$1.75M range if grants aren’t secured), and issuing an RFQ for an architect to assist with phasing and scope definition.
The council offered general support to proceed with design work and to protect strategic reserves but did not adopt a final decision at the study session; items will return for formal action in coming agendas.
