Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Lj Bell Rebuild topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Richmond County board moves forward with LJ Bell rebuild after debate over saving auditorium
Summary
Board members reaffirmed earlier direction to demolish the aging LJ Bell auditorium and add four classrooms while staff warned that preserving the auditorium would add code and temporary-system costs; the board agreed to proceed to protect the project schedule while exploring possible later add‑ons if county tax credits materialize.
The Richmond County Board of Education on June 9 reviewed competing options for the LJ Bell rebuild and reaffirmed prior direction to proceed with demolition of the existing auditorium in order to add four classrooms and keep the construction schedule on track.
Designers from Mosley and contractor Bordeaux Construction told the board that keeping and renovating the auditorium would trigger a cascade of code and utility costs — including connectors to a new fire‑alarm system, sprinklering of the attached space and temporary power and HVAC to protect remaining contents — that would substantially increase project cost while delivering limited classroom benefit.
"The added cost of keeping that auditorium has diminishing returns that doesn't show benefit in new classroom space," Blair Bordeaux, president of Bordeaux Construction, told the board. Ashley Dennis of Mosley said the design team is essentially on hold: "We are not able to move forward on [design] until we know where we're going and what we're drawing. We need a decision soon to be able to move forward."
Board members reviewed prior action on the project and discussed a potential New Markets Tax Credit that county leaders may pursue. Staff cautioned that any tax‑credit funds would not be confirmed until spring 2027 and, if awarded, could be used for add‑ons or later-stage upgrades rather than to change the core program already in design. The presenters recommended a joint meeting with the county to examine feasibility and timing of that financing option.
Several board members noted that a prior vote favored demolition and that further delay would compress an already tight schedule. "We did vote on that though," one member said, urging staff to continue. Chairman Satderfield and Superintendent Dr. Frell both signaled readiness to move forward to keep the project on schedule; presenters said demolition is targeted for the fall, with salvaged materials (bricks or commemorative elements) potentially reused at the new site.
The board did not take a new roll‑call vote at this meeting but members indicated consensus to proceed with the direction previously approved and to brief the county about the tax‑credit possibility. The project team emphasized next steps: finalize schematic design once the board confirms direction, accelerate civil/site planning, and consider early abatement/demolition and early site packages to recover lost schedule.
The presentation and discussion concluded with staff asking for a joint meeting with county commissioners to clarify whether tax‑credit financing would be pursued and, if so, how any awarded funds could be applied as later-stage add‑ons to the LJ Bell project.
