Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Urd Finance Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
HAS URD board reviews $2.4M in unappropriated funds, retains 'no work before approval' rule
Summary
Board reviewed financial position (about $2.4 million unappropriated), discussed infrastructure needs and a proposed wording change for application rules, and voted to retain the requirement that work not start prior to board approval while allowing case-by-case flexibility for one-year timelines.
The Harrison Avenue South Urban Revitalization District Board on Jan. 13 reviewed the district’s financial position, discussed potential infrastructure needs, and approved modest updates to the URD application language while keeping the requirement that applicants not begin work before board approval.
Pauline Giacomino, HAS URD staff, told the board the district currently has about $2.4 million unappropriated increment. She described a proposed landscaping design for Howard Avenue estimated to cost under $80,000 and said staff favors treating small, one-year projects as grants rather than multi-year development agreements so the district can continue to fund new, shorter projects. Karen Byrnes, the district director, said staff are conducting an infrastructure analysis with Public Works to identify wastewater, sewer or stormwater deficiencies that could justify future bonding and extend the URD’s 15-year life if needed.
The board discussed proposed application-language changes intended to avoid opening a loophole that would allow applicants to seek funding after work is completed. Pauline said keeping the clause that "no work shall start before approval" serves as a gatekeeper; board members agreed there should be case-by-case flexibility when unavoidable delays push project timelines beyond one year. Tony Michlig moved to approve the application changes; the motion carried unanimously.
Board members also noted staff emphasis on ensuring accurate W-9s and documentation before processing payments. The meeting minutes record no public opposition and no formal directions to change grant caps; staff will bring projects and any exceptions to the board for approval when necessary.
