Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves resident‑based contractor yard — approval contingent on recorded access easement and parking/landscape conditions
Summary
The board approved a special use permit allowing a small tree/land‑clearing contractor to store trailers and a lift at a residence, but only after the applicant secures and records legally sufficient access easements and completes buffering and improved parking. Approval was unanimous and contingent on recorded easement evidence.
The Marion County Commission voted unanimously on March 17 to approve a special use permit for D&D Tree & Tractor to store business trailers and limited equipment at a rural residence, but only after the applicant secures recorded legal access easements and meets site‑improvement conditions.
Staff had recommended denial because the property sits behind a chain of private easements and the county record showed gaps in legal access. During the hearing the applicant’s surveyor presented drafted legal descriptions and the applicant agreed to record exclusive access easements from multiple adjoining owners. The SUP contains explicit contingencies: the permit will not take effect until the county confirms the recorded access easements connect the parcel to the nearest county‑maintained road; the applicant must install an improved, buffered parking surface for equipment; trailers must be unloaded before traveling public or private unpaved easements; and the applicant must participate in agreed road‑maintenance cost sharing with local residents. County staff also required a 60‑day deadline for easement documentation and a 90‑day compliance window for removal of equipment if easements are not recorded.
Neighbors were split: several residents supported the applicant, noting his long record of road maintenance contributions and neighborly help; some adjacent residents opposed, citing heavy trailers, increased wear on private easements, unpermitted past activity and environmental concerns. Surveyor testimony showed the mapping and access legal descriptions were prepared and ready to record; the board made recordation a binding condition.
The board, applying the county’s home‑business statute and local standards, recognized the potential public‑interest and access issues but concluded the SUP should be allowed if legal access and the site protections are in place. Staff will not clear outstanding code cases tied to the property until required easements are recorded and site improvements are in place.
