Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves kennel permit after heated debate, sets strict conditions including relocation and permitting of containers
Summary
After repeated complaints and a prior revocation, the Marion County Commission approved a special use permit for Canine Specialists with strict conditions — including permitting and relocation of three shipping‑container kennels, a cap of 15 adult dogs, fencing and landscaping improvements, and a six‑month and one‑year review schedule. Vote was 3–2.
The Marion County Board of County Commissioners narrowly approved a special use permit on March 17 allowing a canine boarding/training and limited breeding operation to resume at a rural property that previously lost its permit. The board attached short deadlines and monitoring conditions after neighbors testified repeatedly about persistent noise, unpermitted storage containers and years of disputed compliance.
Kennel owner Lee Borzavalski said he accepts responsibility for past permitting lapses and pledged to meet new requirements, which county staff wrote into the permit. Under the board’s conditions the operation is limited to 15 adult dogs (puppies are excluded from the count until they are four months old), no more than five litters per year, and the existing shipping containers used as kennels must either be permitted or relocated to a new on‑site configuration with their openings oriented and screened to reduce noise impacts.
Growth Services staff explained the SUP followed a revoked permit from 2024 and recommended rigorous conditions to avoid another enforcement cycle. Staff set explicit timelines: connex container permitting and related building permits within 60–90 days, larger landscaping/vegetation and permanent fencing work within six months, and an administrative review at six months and again at one year. If the owner fails to meet conditions, staff will refer the case back for enforcement or a revocation hearing.
Neighbors gave sharply divided testimony. Several nearby residents described clean facilities, hands‑on care and helpful training services; others — including an adjacent homeowner who said containers stand within a few hundred feet of a bedroom — said noise and unpermitted structures have persisted since 2021 and that promises to comply were not honored in the past. Animal Services and code enforcement said they have inspected the property repeatedly; building‑code work remains outstanding for some containers.
Commissioner debate focused on two competing priorities: the county’s obligation to enforce land‑use and permitting requirements and the benefits of local animal‑care services. Supporters argued regulated, locally inspected kennels are preferable to unregulated commercial operations, while opponents warned that weak conditions would leave neighbors exposed to repeated violations. In the end the board approved the permit 3–2, with Commissioners Stone and Zalick casting the dissenting votes.
The decision allows the owner to resume a limited commercial operation only once required permits and site changes are completed and verified. The first administrative review is scheduled for six months; failure to meet the terms could prompt a revocation hearing. The county clerk will maintain the official conditions and monitoring schedule.
