Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission weighs RFP vs. bid for seven North Chavez lots to encourage housing
Summary
City procurement staff recommended using a request-for-proposals (RFP) rather than a straight invitation to bid for seven city parcels on North Chavez so the commission can score redevelopment objectives (housing, mixed use) rather than award by price alone; staff said appraisals and surveys are complete and advertising would require at least 21 days.
The commission discussed how to dispose of seven city‑owned parcels on North Chavez/Travis (appraised and surveyed) and whether to use an Invitation to Bid (price‑focused) or a Request for Proposals (RFP) that would allow evaluation of redevelopment plans, minimum investment standards, timelines and reversion clauses.
Leslie Bolt, the city procurement officer, said that because each parcel’s appraised value exceeds $25,000 the procedural concern is compliance with state procurement and municipal ordinances; an RFP gives the city flexibility to include non‑price criteria such as affordable‑housing commitments, construction timelines and quarterly deliverables. Bolt said appraisals and surveys are complete and noted utility checks already performed.
Commissioners and local economic‑development representatives said the neighborhood needs housing and that an RFP focused on housing outcomes would help steer redevelopment away from incompatible commercial uses (trucking yards) that currently exist at the edges of the area. Staff estimated 21 days minimum advertising for an RFP, and procurement staff offered to have a draft solicitation ready for commission review by the next meeting.
A resident and a business partner in the room asked whether commercial zoning would require a rezoning to residential for housing projects; staff replied that the current commercial zoning allows housing if setbacks and code requirements are met, though insurance and permitting costs may differ for property owners. Commissioners asked staff to draft an RFP scope tied to the commission’s priorities and return it for review.
