Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Job Descriptions Probation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board questions vague 'short period' wording in job descriptions; HR outlines probation rules, reopens senior accountant recruitment
Summary
Board members asked for clearer timetables in new job descriptions for positions including cybersecurity, software analyst and senior accountant. HR staffer Christopher said the city uses a 12-month probationary period (18 months for public safety), with evaluations at six months and year-end, and can extend probation up to six months when certifications are needed; the senior accountant recruitment was reopened after an insufficient candidate pool.
Merced City — Board members at the June 8 Merced City Personnel Board meeting pressed for clearer timelines in several new job descriptions and received a detailed explanation of the city’s probationary rules from HR staffer Christopher.
A board member raised concerns that six job descriptions listed only a "short period" to learn duties and asked what that meant in practice for positions including cybersecurity, software analyst, associate planner, senior accountant, assistant accountant and tree trimmer.
Christopher responded that "all new employees with the city of Merced are on a 12-month probationary period," with evaluations at six months and again at the 12-month mark. He added that public-safety positions have an 18-month probationary period and that departments may grant up to a six-month extension to allow employees time to obtain necessary licenses or certifications.
"Different bargaining units have different established probationary periods for promotions, but all employees, regardless of bargaining unit, have a minimum 12-month probationary period," Christopher said, describing the personnel rules and the department practice of monitoring employees during probation through performance evaluations.
The board also asked for an update on the senior accountant (payroll) recruitment. Christopher said the city could not establish an employment list because it did not identify at least three qualified candidates; as a result the recruitment was reopened, and the finance department is reviewing applications for a second round.
Board members did not direct a policy change during the meeting; Christopher said the personnel rules and regulations are under legal review to be modernized and that departments currently use probationary evaluations and extensions as needed.
The meeting concluded after routine business and the board voted to adjourn.
