Get email alerts on the TDR Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission accepts TDR annual review, recommends no immediate boundary changes
Summary
Staff reported the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) annual review showing a theoretical receiving-area capacity of 2,330 dwelling units and about 23.96% currently developed; the commission accepted the report and deferred any boundary changes to upcoming zoning-map and comprehensive-plan work.
Get email alerts on the TDR Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Caroline County Planning Commission accepted the planning department’s annual review of the county’s Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program and recommended no immediate changes to the receiving-area boundary.
Matt, planning staff, explained the department’s method: he counts new (non-replacement) building permits when calculating development capacity. He reported 32 permits counted as new for this analysis and said the receiving-area maximum theoretical buildout is 2,330 dwelling units; based on those numbers, about 23.96% of receiving-area capacity is currently developed.
Matt recommended keeping the receiving-area boundary unchanged for now and suggested any boundary modifications be considered as part of zoning-map amendments undertaken alongside the comprehensive-plan and zoning chapter updates.
A motion to accept Matt’s report was made and seconded; the commission approved the acceptance by voice vote. Commissioners asked staff to continue refining parcel-level data and to track when new lots are created so future capacity estimates better reflect on-the-ground conditions.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
