Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Election Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board authorizes legal and operational steps to protect election workers and respond to interference
Summary
Facing national litigation and incidents elsewhere, the board directed County Counsel and election officials to prepare legal defenses for election workers, contingency plans and interagency coordination for the June and November elections; Registrar‑Recorder Dean Logan described layered training and outreach measures.
With opening of vote centers days away, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on May 19 approved a motion to bolster the county's preparedness and legal posture for the June primary and the November general elections.
Co‑authored by Supervisors Hilda Solis and Lindsey Horvath, the motion grants County Counsel authority to coordinate rapid legal responses to federal interference or other threats to election administration, to support or initiate litigation when necessary, and to provide legal defense for county election workers who face federal or civil actions for performing their duties in good faith. The board voted to approve the motion.
Registrar‑Recorder Dean Logan briefed supervisors on preparedness measures: county employees are prioritized to staff vote centers, de‑escalation training for workers is in place, field coordinators and reservists are positioned to respond to incidents, and a joint information system will be used to centralize public communications. Logan said the department is conducting phased voter outreach, sample ballot mailings, and push notifications to confirm receipt of returned ballots.
Assistant Sheriff and Office of Emergency Management staff described operational coordination: the county has activated interagency incident management structures, assigned security at key processing centers, and established a Joint Information Team for centralized public messaging. Supervisors asked for additional reporting on staffing, training and legal thresholds.
The motion directs County Counsel to define the scope of authority and return with recommendations and operational protocols for rapid legal response; the Board emphasized that election workers should feel protected from threats and should have timely access to legal advice if targeted for doing their jobs.
Why it matters: The motion responds to a pattern of ballot‑related incidents elsewhere and to possible federal litigation that could alter voting rules; the board said rapid preparation is essential to protect ballot access and worker safety.
What's next: County Counsel and the Registrar‑Recorder will coordinate and report back to the board on legal and operational protocols and resource needs ahead of the November election.
