Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Athletics And Student Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

School board approves athletic trainers contract amid budget questions

School Board · June 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved a renewed contract for UF athletic trainers to continue providing on-site care, concussion screening and heat-related practice oversight. Members debated how to cover costs—proposing school fee-sharing, scholarships and grant-seeking—before approving the contract by voice vote.

The school board approved a contract to continue providing athletic trainers through the University of Florida program, after a lengthy discussion about student safety, liability and how to pay for rising costs.

Miss Wade, who removed the item from the consent agenda to invite fuller discussion, said the trainers “will not let a player play if they’ve had a concussion,” and highlighted on-campus physical therapy that she said reduces emergency-room visits and family travel. She presented a 24–25 cost comparison and said the trainers have been valuable in heat-related practice decisions and in acute injuries.

Board members acknowledged an earlier budget warning from district finance staff and asked whether the district can afford the contract. Members discussed multiple options for covering the expense: shifting a larger share to individual schools (figures cited in the discussion ranged from a school share of roughly 40% down to smaller percentages discussed elsewhere), modest increases in participation or activity fees (examples given included $25 at some schools), using principal accounts and booster or community support, and pursuing external grants (members named NFL and Gatorade as examples). A board member recommended establishing a uniform district fee policy with scholarship support for students who cannot pay.

Miss Wade and others also described negotiating with the provider to limit proposed increases; she relayed that a proposed 5% increase had been reduced in negotiations to 2% for the district. Members suggested returning the financing details to an administrative workshop with athletic directors and principals so fees and scholarship rules could be standardized across schools.

After the discussion, a motion to approve the UF athletic training contract (to take effect in July) was moved, seconded and approved by voice vote. The transcript records the voice vote as “motion passes” but does not record a roll-call tally or the names of the mover and seconder.

The public comment period produced no speakers. Board members then approved the minutes and the consent and finance agenda by voice votes. The superintendent offered brief district updates and congratulated newly appointed leaders.

What happens next: Board members asked staff to work with school administrators on a district-wide approach to fees, scholarships and grant research so the funding structure for the contract is clarified before the school year begins.