Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission recommends two‑horse special‑use permit in Rolling Hills with conditions
Summary
The commission recommended approval of a two‑horse special‑use permit in Rolling Hills after weighing IFAS guidance and county code: staff recommended increased fenced area and manure management; neighbors and immediate neighbors largely supported the applicants' family/4‑H use.
Get email alerts on the Animals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Marion County Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval of a special‑use permit to allow two horses on an R‑1 lot in the Rolling Hills subdivision, attaching conditions to mitigate environmental and neighborhood concerns.
Staff advised that county code allows smaller fenced areas for horses under SUP but noted that IFAS guidance generally recommends about 2 acres per horse; staff and IFAS expressed concerns about the sandy soils in the area, potential erosion and water‑quality impacts from manure if not properly managed. As a result staff proposed alternative conditions including expanding the fenced area (applicant concept increased to roughly 39,800 square feet), routinely removing/storing manure on concrete and ensuring accessory structures and setbacks meet code.
Applicants Gladys Gonzalez and Andre (recorded in the transcript as the property owners) said the horses are for family use and for a potential 4‑H activity for their child; they agreed to required conditions and said the animals are well cared for. Several immediate neighbors testified in support, citing that the property has adequate space and that the horses are well maintained. One opponent raised concerns about compatibility in a growing subdivision but the commission accepted alternate staff conditions and recommended approval with the reduced‑to‑29,000 square‑foot fenced area that the applicants already have in place and with requirements for manure management and periodic inspections.
The recommendation is advisory; the final decision will rest with the Board of County Commissioners at the March 17 hearing. Commissioners noted this is a special‑use permit that runs with the property but can be revoked if conditions are violated.
