Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parcel Tax topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

San Dimas council raises landscape parcel tax by 3.4% to keep maintenance fund solvent; one abstention

San Dimas City Council · June 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council adopted Resolution 2026-39 to increase the citywide landscape parcel tax by the March-to-March CPI of 3.4% to help cover rising water and contract costs for park and median maintenance; the measure passed 4–0 with one abstention.

The San Dimas City Council on June 9 approved a 3.4% adjustment to the citywide landscape parcel tax to help offset rising maintenance costs, adopting Resolution 2026-39. Staff recommended the increase — an automatic CPI adjustment permitted under Ordinance 1086 — to align tax revenue with higher contract and utility costs for landscape maintenance.

Scott Wasserman, Director of Parks & Recreation, told the council the parcel-tax fund (Fund 8) pays for citywide landscape and tree maintenance performed by the city's primary contractors, Nevvis Landscape and West Coast Arborist, and that Option 1 (3.4% CPI increase) is projected to raise revenue to $1,107,414 for FY 2026–27 while still leaving an estimated Fund 8 deficit of roughly $239,025 that would require general-fund subsidy.

A public commenter cited sharply higher Golden State Water rates and widespread tree-disease costs (eucalyptus beetle treatments) as drivers that make the parcel tax and scope for maintenance more expensive. "They invested a lot of money. Recently, probably our rates are going up to use Golden State Water," a public speaker said, urging the council to account for water and disease-treatment costs.

Councilmembers debated whether to apply the CPI increase and discussed longer-term options such as altering planting scope, pursuing recycled water or going to voters for a larger increase. After deliberation the council voted to adopt Option 1; the motion carried 4 in favor, 0 opposed, 1 abstention (Councilmember Vienna abstained). The adjustment is intended to reduce the rate at which the general fund must subsidize landscape maintenance but staff said ongoing discussion about scope and long-term solutions is warranted.