Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rights Of Nature topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ulster County committee postpones public hearing on rights‑of‑nature local law after legal counsel raises standing, liability and preemption concerns
Summary
Committee postponed a July public hearing on a proposed local law recognizing rights of county waterways after the sponsor requested more legal review; legislative counsel warned citizen‑suit provisions could create novel standing and liability issues and may conflict with SEQRA/seeker processes.
The Ulster County Energy, Environment & Sustainability Committee postponed a planned public hearing on a proposed local law intended to recognize rights for several county waterways and allow private enforcement, after members and counsel raised legal and administrative questions.
Sponsor Legislator Nolan asked the committee to delay the hearing so outside experts — including an international lawyer the sponsor cited and representatives of communities with rights‑of‑nature precedents — could present and committee members could review stronger language. Nolan said she is seeking to refine the draft to avoid unintended consequences while advancing the county’s environmental goals.
Legislative counsel and the county attorney cautioned that adding a citizen‑suit mechanism and fee/fine structure to county law raises substantial legal issues. Counsel said standing for private citizens to bring new causes of action is narrowly construed in New York and he had not found precedent that supports the form of standing proposed; he also flagged potential preemption issues with SEQRA and questions about statutory authority to impose fines.
“The purpose of moving a rights of nature law forward is to change the law so that the law actually recognizes new rights‑bearing entities,” the sponsor read from outside counsel’s advice, quoting Thomas Lindsay, but said she wanted more time for legal vetting and public discussion before the committee proceeded.
Committee members requested a public working session with legislative counsel, county counsel and outside experts before the next committee meeting to vet standing, jurisdictional and enforcement questions. After debate the committee voted to postpone the public‑hearing resolution to the next month’s meeting to allow additional review and a planned working group discussion.
What’s next: the sponsor and staff will schedule a public working session with legislative and county counsel and invited experts; the public hearing will be rescheduled after legal questions are addressed.
Provenance: Discussion and postponement: SEG 1261–SEG 1566; broader rights‑of‑nature/resolution 178 discussion and postponement: SEG 1581–SEG 1942.
