Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission remands draft zoning ordinance on rural building-eligibility transfers to planning commission
Summary
The board voted to remand a draft ordinance to the planning commission so staff can hold a public hearing on two options to ease transfer rules for rural building eligibilities: transfers to contiguous parcels (no same-owner requirement) or transfers anywhere within the same township. Planning staff said roughly 14,000 eligibilities remain countywide.
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Toby Brown of the Lincoln County Planning and Zoning Department asked the board on June 9 to remand a draft ordinance amendment back to the planning commission so it can hold a formal public hearing and return a final ordinance for the commission's consideration.
Brown outlined two draft options. The first would remove a "same ownership" requirement while keeping transfers limited to contiguous parcels; the second would allow transfers anywhere within the same township. He said the county's existing density provisions permit roughly one house per quarter section in the rural area and estimated about 14,000 building-eligibility units remain available countywide.
Brown told commissioners the change is intended to reduce bureaucracy that now requires ownership transfers or other workarounds and to give landowners additional flexibility. He also reported that townships, school districts and rural water systems have expressed concerns about the tax-base and service impacts if eligibilities move outside current boundaries.
Public commenters weighed in favorably on a remand. One commenter said the current system is "broken" and urged simplifying transfers; another said transferring eligibilities within townships could preserve tax revenue locally while opening opportunities for buyers and sellers.
The board voted to remand the draft ordinance to planning and zoning for public hearings and further consideration, with a recorded roll call approving the remand (Putnham voted no; Schmidt, Arens, and Landine voted yes). The remand does not adopt any ordinance language—it directs additional public process and potential revisions.
Next steps: planning and zoning will conduct a public hearing, consider additional stakeholder proposals and return a recommended ordinance to the county commission.

