Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing Density topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves two-unit compromise for West 6th Street lot after three-unit request

City of Erie Zoning Hearing Board · June 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lynette Thompson sought a variance to build three studio units at 1007 West 6th Street but the Zoning Hearing Board agreed to a compromise approving a two-unit dimensional variance, citing density rules and building-code cost concerns; the vote carried unanimously among members present.

The City of Erie Zoning Hearing Board on June 9 approved a dimensional variance allowing two dwelling units at 1007 West 6th Street rather than the three units the applicant originally requested, after board members cited density rules and potential building-code costs for three units.

Applicant Lynette Thompson, sworn to testify, told the board she owns the property and has considered several development options after a proposed laundromat plan failed. Thompson said the lot measures 1,991 square feet while the zoning requirement in that R2 district calls for 2,000 square feet per family unit, meaning a three-unit proposal would require a variance of roughly 4,009 square feet beyond the lot’s area.

Thompson argued three small studio apartments would provide affordable single-occupant housing — "we're looking at seniors, students, traveling employees" — and estimated each unit could be about 566 square feet. Board members questioned whether setbacks and existing nonconforming conditions would allow the layout; staff characterized the building as an existing nonconforming structure and noted parking and lot-coverage considerations.

During deliberation the board noted that approving three units would trigger more stringent building-code requirements (including systems such as sprinklers) and significantly increase construction cost. Board member Tom Sebold moved to approve a dimensional variance limited to two units as a compromise; the motion was seconded by Ed Dawson and carried with the votes recorded as: Mr. Sebold — approved; Mr. Dawson — approved; Ms. King — approved. Thompson indicated she preferred three units but agreed to two if three was not permitted.

The board’s action resolves appeal 13339 in favor of a two-unit dimensional variance. The applicant was instructed to pursue the necessary permits and to proceed under the conditions set by building officials.