Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Density topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves two-unit compromise for West 6th Street lot after three-unit request
Summary
Lynette Thompson sought a variance to build three studio units at 1007 West 6th Street but the Zoning Hearing Board agreed to a compromise approving a two-unit dimensional variance, citing density rules and building-code cost concerns; the vote carried unanimously among members present.
Get email alerts on the Housing Density topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The City of Erie Zoning Hearing Board on June 9 approved a dimensional variance allowing two dwelling units at 1007 West 6th Street rather than the three units the applicant originally requested, after board members cited density rules and potential building-code costs for three units.
Applicant Lynette Thompson, sworn to testify, told the board she owns the property and has considered several development options after a proposed laundromat plan failed. Thompson said the lot measures 1,991 square feet while the zoning requirement in that R2 district calls for 2,000 square feet per family unit, meaning a three-unit proposal would require a variance of roughly 4,009 square feet beyond the lot’s area.
Thompson argued three small studio apartments would provide affordable single-occupant housing — "we're looking at seniors, students, traveling employees" — and estimated each unit could be about 566 square feet. Board members questioned whether setbacks and existing nonconforming conditions would allow the layout; staff characterized the building as an existing nonconforming structure and noted parking and lot-coverage considerations.
During deliberation the board noted that approving three units would trigger more stringent building-code requirements (including systems such as sprinklers) and significantly increase construction cost. Board member Tom Sebold moved to approve a dimensional variance limited to two units as a compromise; the motion was seconded by Ed Dawson and carried with the votes recorded as: Mr. Sebold — approved; Mr. Dawson — approved; Ms. King — approved. Thompson indicated she preferred three units but agreed to two if three was not permitted.
The board’s action resolves appeal 13339 in favor of a two-unit dimensional variance. The applicant was instructed to pursue the necessary permits and to proceed under the conditions set by building officials.

