Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislative Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rules committee finds budget bills substantially constitutional, flags legal drafting concerns
Summary
The Rules Committee recommended that a package of House budget bills and Senate Bill 1630 are "constitutional and proper form" after a rules-office review, but staff warned fee-bill drafting, appropriation 'strings' and nonprofit expenditures could raise separation-of-powers and gift-clause issues; the committee approved the recommendation 8-0.
The Rules Committee voted unanimously to recommend that a set of House budget bills and Senate Bill 1630 are "constitutional and in proper form," while the legislature's rules counsel raised legal cautions about how some provisions are drafted.
Tim Fleming of the Rules Office told committee members the office had reviewed each bill. "The budget package, we think that our recommendation is that it's substantially constitutional. It's in proper form," Fleming said, while noting several drafting concerns that could pose legal risks.
Fleming said fee-bill language should be limited to appropriations and not include substantive policy directives in footnotes. He warned that "there are things in the footnotes... that might go beyond just what seems to be the appropriation and instead encroach into the realm of substantive policy directives," and recommended moving such language into the main bill text.
He also raised a separation-of-powers concern about conditions on appropriations that require review by a legislative body. "You'll see that the appropriation has a sort of a condition that there has to be a review by a legislative agency... and then the definition in the end says that the review means a vote by the entire committee. Basically it's an approval," Fleming said, warning that tying an appropriation to committee approval could create constitutional tension between the legislative and executive functions.
Fleming added that some earmarked expenditures to nonprofits in the budget package could risk a violation of the state gift clause or otherwise appear to single out entities, and urged careful drafting. He also noted a health-bill provision that appears to affect county spending limits under Article 9, Section 20, saying the office does not think that provision would be enforceable as written.
After a brief offer from Fleming to provide examples and follow up with members, the committee moved to a vote. Secretary Paul Whitwell called the roll; committee members recorded eight ayes and zero nays. The presiding officer announced the result as "8 aye, 0 nays." The committee recorded the recommendation to find the measures constitutional and in proper form.
The action is procedural: the committee's recommendation on constitutional form does not itself enact policy but clears the listed measures to proceed to the next legislative steps that follow statutory and chamber rules. Committee members did not take further testimony on the bills during the recorded segment.
Votes at a glance: committee recommendation to find the listed bills constitutional and in proper form — outcome: approved, vote tally 8-0.
