Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Procurement Curriculum topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Education committee advances curriculum and program purchases to full board

Centennial School District Education Student Services Committee · June 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Centennial School District Education Student Services Committee voted to forward 15 purchase and approval recommendations — including multiple supplemental curricula and program subscriptions funded from access funds — to the full board for final approval.

The Centennial School District Education Student Services Committee on June 10 voted to forward 15 recommendations to the full school board for purchase or approval, including several supplemental curricula and program subscriptions to be paid from district access funds.

The recommendations (items 8.1–8.15) include a professional services agreement with Matthew McCarthy, an AI translation-management subscription, the teacher leader list for 2026–27, the William Tennant ATSI plan, and multiple curriculum purchases. Committee members discussed the need to replenish reading-Olympics library titles and to secure curricular materials before vendors run out.

Committee members reviewed costs for the biggest line items. A presenter said the attainment company supplemental curriculum is $12,471.90; Reading Horizons was listed at $89,782.97; Second Step (social-emotional supplemental curriculum) at $21,888; and the STAR autism support package (three pieces) at $24,865. The presenter noted the purchases will be paid from access funds rather than the general budget.

The motion to forward the recommendations was seconded and approved by voice vote. The items will be considered at the full board meeting on June 23.

The committee also clarified that the curricula selected were chosen to allow students to access general-education content while receiving intensive interventions, and that external review partners (Hanover) advised the selections.