Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Outcomes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District reports strong LAP/Title I intervention gains; leaders outline WIN schedule plans
Summary
District leaders reported that many students served through LAP and Title I made typical or stretch growth this year, with specific highlights at Columbia Crest and Warehouser; the district plans to expand WIN intervention schedules and align special education pullouts to protect core instruction.
District leaders presented Title I and LAP (state) program reports showing measurable intervention gains across schools and outlined scheduling changes to preserve core instruction while delivering targeted support.
The Title I overview reviewed federal requirements for schoolwide models, evidence‑based strategies, family engagement set‑asides and professional development funds. The report explained how buildings qualify for Title I based on free and reduced‑price meal percentages and described use of Panorama and i‑Ready for screening and progress monitoring.
LAP presentations highlighted examples of accelerated student gains: Columbia Crest reported 39 students who made 15+ months of growth in ELA while served in intervention; Warehouser and Eatonville Elementary showed similar stretch growth results in math and reading. District leaders emphasized the importance of master‑schedule design so interventions do not remove students from essential core instruction and previewed an elementary WIN rotation model for next year that embeds interventions into daily schedules.
Leaders also described how LAP funds can be used for community partnerships (up to 15%) to supplement services the district cannot provide, and noted that LAP and Title I funding streams are separate though coordinated. The board discussed continuing to monitor students who make less than typical growth and adjust instruction and materials accordingly.
Next steps include continued rollout of the WIN model at elementary schools, more cross‑district teacher collaboration to share intervention practices, and attention to math intervention materials at the middle school level.
