Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Logistics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board flags room conflict and local construction as meeting opens
Summary
Planning members noted a possible double booking with a Klet Park public hearing that could force a move downstairs, flagged livestreaming requirements, and discussed observed construction at Beard Avenue and incomplete submissions from Reynolds.
Planning participants noted a scheduling conflict that could affect where tonight's meeting is held and whether the session can be videotaped. A participant said the meeting room "seems to be double booked for six o'clock" because of a public hearing for Klet Park and that the board might need to "move downstairs," though no formal decision was recorded.
Board members also raised technical and legal concerns about recording. One participant said, "If that the case, we won't be able to videotape the meeting, which is against the law." Another added, "The law says we have to stream live stream," prompting the group to discuss whether available equipment and audio quality would be sufficient.
Participants identified 'Jimmy' as the director of public buildings when discussing who might be involved with the other meeting. "That's Jimmy. He's the um director of public buildings," a participant said; board members said they were unsure whether he was running or merely attending the park meeting.
Members also discussed current development activity they had observed: an application from Reynolds appeared to have insufficient materials for the night's agenda, and one site had rock and ledge constraints. Several participants remarked they had seen new construction at Beard Avenue with "one floor up already," and questioned whether the work required board review.
No votes or formal scheduling decisions were made on these items in the recorded exchange. The meeting proceeded with plans to address the agenda items and handle any room or livestreaming issues as needed.
