Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Data Centers topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

City adopts moratorium on data-center permits while staff studies water, power and zoning

Edmond City Council · June 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Edmond City Council unanimously adopted an ordinance placing a moratorium (through Dec. 31, 2026) on new data-center rezoning and building-permit applications while staff studies definitions, infrastructure impacts and policy options; the emergency clause passed as well.

The Edmond City Council voted unanimously to adopt a moratorium on acceptance of rezoning requests and building permits that would allow construction or expansion of data centers within city limits, giving staff six months (with interim reporting) to research definitions, infrastructure cost recovery methods and zoning choices.

Ken Bryan, director of planning, told council staff identified several research topics, including types of data centers, appropriate zoning districts, lessons from other jurisdictions and infrastructure impacts on water and electricity. Council members repeatedly cited concerns about the potential for large water and electric demands, noise from backup generators and community backlash. One council member said the moratorium is important to avoid a situation where a large tract zoned agricultural could quickly be repurposed for a data center without local controls.

Multiple residents and local experts addressed the council during the public hearing. Andrew Fleet, who said he founded an Oklahoma State University data-center research committee, offered to supply checklists and recommended a fully funded cost-benefit analysis should a data center proposal advance. Wendy Dial, citing geological expertise, raised concerns about PFAS contamination associated with some data-center cooling systems. Other residents described noise, privacy and water-supply concerns.

Supporters of the moratorium argued it preserves local control while staff completes its work; others urged the council to consider both small-scale and hyperscale facilities and to distinguish among different types of operations. Council members also discussed recent state legislation (House Bill 2992) that creates new notice and customer-protection requirements for large electric-load customers.

Council voted 5–0 to adopt the moratorium ordinance and subsequently approved the emergency clause 5–0, meaning staff will proceed under an expedited timeline and return with findings and recommended code changes.