Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Committee Structure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Fishers Advisory Committee adopts subcommittee structure to turn public feedback into action

Fishers Advisory Committee · April 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Fishers Advisory Committee set a new subcommittee model to convert recommendations from its March 'Point of View' event into quarterly progress reports and targeted outcomes, asking subcommittees to prioritize one or a few achievable actions each year.

The Fishers Advisory Committee on June 1 voted verbally to begin operating under a formalized subcommittee structure aimed at converting community input into measurable outcomes. Kelly Hartman, who led the overview, told members the new approach will have the full advisory body meet quarterly while subcommittees convene between meetings to advance prioritized projects.

"We have all these great conversations, but we don't have a specific structure to dump those recommendations in and then look at how do we actually tackle outcomes," Hartman said, urging each subcommittee to return to the full committee with a one-page working document and a small set of realistic goals.

The plan uses the committee's March 2026 Point of View event as a source of recommended actions and asks subcommittees to document historical work and current priorities so the full group can track progress. Hartman suggested subcommittees select one major outcome when recommendations are numerous.

Members gave examples of role matching: Chrissy Pogue was cited as an education lead because she "works for the school system," and Cecilia Cobalt is the transportation lead and is to report back after a July 1 meeting with Hamilton County Express and county officials.

The committee emphasized collaboration with city staff and county partners to avoid duplicating existing projects. Hartman advised subcommittees to "run that by us" when they plan initiatives so staff can flag overlapping efforts or suggest appropriate partners.

The committee did not take formal legislative action beyond approving minutes and establishing the process; it asked each subcommittee to meet and send preliminary changes to Hartman within the next week or two as the master document is finalized.

Next steps: subcommittees will meet, produce a one-page annual workplan, and report progress at quarterly full-committee meetings. The advisory committee's next meeting is scheduled for Sept. 15.