Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Improvement Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board directs revised CIP review after debate over Wooster High rebuild and admin facility funding
Summary
After months of committee debate, the Washoe County School District board directed staff to return a revised 10‑year capital improvement plan to the Capital Funding Protection Committee recommending a phased reconstruction of Wooster High School and restoration of funding for future administrative facilities; trustees also grappled with removing textbook funding and how to phase large projects.
Get email alerts on the Capital Improvement Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Washoe County School District Board of Trustees on June 9 directed the superintendent to send a revised 10‑year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) back to the Capital Funding Protection Committee for their reconsideration, including staff’s recommendation for a phased full reconstruction of Wooster High School and restoration of funding for future administrative facilities.
Why it matters: The revised CIP reallocates large capital resources across the district and will shape school modernization, campus reconstructions and central office investments for the decade ahead. The board and staff emphasized a better public process after some stakeholders said they learned about scope changes only late in the review cycle.
What staff proposed: District staff outlined the evolution of the CIP after months of public meetings and committee votes. Initial committee recommendations removed textbook funding and shifted some projects; staff later proposed alternatives, including restoring admin facility funding and expanding Wooster’s scope from modernization to a full reconstruction now estimated at roughly $164 million. CFO Mark Mats said the net fiscal impact of the Wooster scope increase (about $85 million) could be absorbed by drawing down part of year‑10 reserves while preserving significant long‑range bonding capacity.
Staff framed the work as iterative and responsive: “We’ve listened carefully to input, reviewed all available data, and developed a refined CIP,” Chief Operating Officer Adam Cersei said in the presentation, adding that the revisions reflect public feedback.
Trustee concerns and public comment: Trustees praised staff’s iterative work but pressed for earlier notice of substantive changes, clearer presentation of alternatives and a fuller explanation of funding impacts. A stream of public commenters — including students, principals and neighborhood advocates from the Wooster community — urged the board to approve a full reconstruction, saying a rebuilt high school would modernize programs (including International Baccalaureate) and spur community revitalization.
Vote and next steps: The board’s motion sent the revised CIP and staff recommendations back to the Capital Funding Protection Committee with direction to consider the full reconstruction of Wooster while restoring admin facility funding. The motion passed unanimously. Staff will return with committee feedback and implementation details, including phasing and program planning, and start an academic engagement process for Wooster during the coming school year.
Provenance: Board discussion and staff presentation, June 9, 2026; CFPC materials and earlier April/May meeting records were cited repeatedly in the public record.
Sources: Presentations by Adam Cersei, Tammy Zimmerman and Mark Mats; public comment from Wooster students and community members; board deliberations, June 9, 2026.

